Follow us on Facebook to receive important updates Follow us on Twitter to receive important updates Follow us on sina.com's microblogging site to receive important updates Follow us on Douban to receive important updates
Chinese Text Project Wiki
-> -> Search for "ctext:588089"
Search details:
Scope: 日本訪書志
Condition : References 「本草綱目
Total 2

日本訪書志卷九

15
案此本與孫氏《問經堂叢書》本全同,唯卷末多《補遺》二十二條。考孫氏自序,於此書源流甚晰,不應是竊人之書。黃氏輯逸書至二百八十條,亦不應攫人之作以充數。而卷末二十二條,非平日用力此學亦不能得也。疑黃氏輯書時,但就孫本較核,及書成,又得二十二條於孫本之外,故附刻其末,然不應沒孫氏名而直署己作。又《本草》目錄明載李時珍本草綱目》第二卷,孫氏失採,而黃氏亦不遵之,至金山顧氏始為拈出。《補遺》二十二條,大半是《証類》黑字,唯引《續博物志》一條,疑是序例佚文。
19
元大德壬寅刊本,不附寇宗奭《本草衍義》,避孝宗《嫌》名,蓋原于宋刻,為慎徽原書。按此書有兩本:一名《大觀本草》,三十一卷,艾晟所序,刻于大觀二年者,即此本也;一名《政和本草》三十一卷,以第三十一卷移於三十卷之前,合為一卷,而刪其所引十六家《本草義例》,最謬。政和六年曹孝忠奉敕校刊者。二本皆不附入寇氏《衍義》。至元初,平陽張存惠重刻政和本,始增入《衍義》及藥有異名者,注於目錄之下。首有木記,稱「泰和甲子下己酉冬南至晦明軒記」,錢竹汀考為元定宗后稱制之年,其說至確。《提要》以為金泰和刻本,誤。餘別有詳考,載入成化刻《政和本草》之首。至明萬歷丁丑,宣城王大獻始以成化重刻政和之本,依其家所藏宗文書院《大觀》本之篇題,合二本為一書,卷末有王大獻後序,自記甚明。並去政和本諸序跋,獨留「大觀艾晟序」及「宗文書院」木記,按其名則「大觀」,考其書則「政和」,無知妄作,莫此為甚。又有萬歷庚子巡按兩淮鹽課御史彭端吾據王本重刊,並去艾晟序、「宗文」木記。《提要》所稱大德本及錢竹汀所錄皆是此種。《提要》見此本亦增入《衍義》,遂謂元代重刊,又從金本錄入,而不知大德原本並無《衍義》也。又有朝鮮國翻刻本,一依宗文本,不增改一字,較明人為謹飭焉。此書集《本草》之大成,最足依據。至李時珍本草綱目》,頗傷龐雜,不為典要。顧《大觀》、《政和》兩本糅雜不清,前人未見古本,多不能分別,故為之詳疏如此。

Enjoy this site? Please help.Site design and content copyright 2006-2024. When quoting or citing information from this site, please link to the corresponding page or to https://ctext.org. Please note that the use of automatic download software on this site is strictly prohibited, and that users of such software are automatically banned without warning to save bandwidth. 沪ICP备09015720号-3Comments? Suggestions? Please raise them here.